Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
PhD Student in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2
Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, and Lecturer in Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Wisdom, and consequently, philosophy as the symbol of rationality, is one of most important components of the formation of religious epistemology in the bilateral relationship of wisdom and narration. In this regard, enumerating revelation, wisdom, and heart intuition and discovery as means to religious knowledge, and using these three, Allameh Tabataba'i has tried to create a unitary approach in the area of religious knowledge. But, introducing separation and inventing terms like self-founded religious wisdom and treasured wisdom, Mr. Hakimi tries to imply independence of religious texts from philosophical understanding. It is attempted to study this issue through a library method and a comparison of the works of these two. Findings indicate a lack of correspondence between the two viewpoints and the approaches taken. Hakimi is found to fight and avoid philosophy as much as Tabataba’i is found to be a philosopher and practitioner of philosophy in the area of religious teachings, such that Hakimi emphasizes self-efficacy and argumentation of the appearances of religious texts and rejects any philosophical inquiry in religious texts.
Keywords
Subjects
